Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488185 --- Comment #8 from KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-05 20:54:54 EDT --- > The "re2c" is a parser engine, so this package has no relations. > Now I asks for PHP experts to confirm whether my understanding is correct, > or not. > http://marc.info/?l=pecl-dev&m=123621647005625&w=2 PHP expert also agreed to ignore this warning in this package. http://marc.info/?l=pecl-dev&m=123627059603922&w=2 (In reply to comment #7) > Okay, two issues/questions > > * Source tarball > - source tarball in your srpm differs from what I could download > from the URL written in your spec file. > Does this mean that the source tarball used is the pre-release > of 0.1.2? If so, please follow "Pre-release package" naming guideline. Sorry, it was the regenerated tarball from CVS repos in same version by my hand. The correct tarball is the one uploaded at: http://pecl.php.net/selinux It was fixed on updated SRPM. > * %changelog > - EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) information in %changelog differs > from the actual EVR of this rpm. Please fix it. Oops, "x.y.z" was "x.z.y". Fixed. The updated packages are here: Spec: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/php-pecl-selinux.spec.20090306 SRPM: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/php-pecl-selinux-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review