Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-05 15:34:45 EDT --- The original public domain work is Public Domain. A modified, or derived work, can be under any license that the new author of the work wants. Since Public Domain is not a license, but the absence of a license (or if it helps you wrap your brain around it, the granting of all possible rights), it doesn't matter. My comments reflected upon an entirely Public Domain work, because we need to track that in the spec file somehow. If someone came along and made changes to a public domain work under GPLv2+, it would be fine to say: License: GPLv2+ because that is in every way functionally identical to: License: GPLv2+ and Public Domain As to removing DJB's copyright notice, DJB did that. It would be nice to reference his message in which he took that action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review