Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #13 from Mark Johnson <johnsonm@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-05 12:04:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I know I'm probably butting in where I'm not wanted, but... > > At the moment, via this URL: > > http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec > > I see: > > License: GPLv2+ > > Is that a mistake or do you intend the changes you have made for this package > under the GPL? Coherent grammer: Is that a mistake or do you intend the changes you have made for this package to be covered by the GPL? If the latter, should the license for the whole package really be listed as GPL when the original source is Public Domain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review