[Bug 199168] Review Request: CGAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: CGAL
Alias: CGAL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168





------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-17 09:18 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)

> > Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense.
> > Consider this to be a MUST FIX.
> > 
> > Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into 
> *-devel.
> 
> As I said in comment #11, libs already are in CGAL-libs, and devel files are 
> in CGAL-devel. I do not understand your point. What is the contradiction with 
> Fedora conventions?

CGAL would be assumed to contain runtime libs and/or applications and must not
depend on *-devel.

I would rename CGAL-libs into CGAL and drop the current CGAL entirely. It
doesn't make sense.

Alternatively, if you want to keep *-libs, just drop CGAL entirely.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]