Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: CGAL Alias: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-17 09:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Contradicts Fedora conventions and IMNSOH, is complete non-sense. > > Consider this to be a MUST FIX. > > > > Put the run-time libs into CGAL or CGAL-libs and the devel files into > *-devel. > > As I said in comment #11, libs already are in CGAL-libs, and devel files are > in CGAL-devel. I do not understand your point. What is the contradiction with > Fedora conventions? CGAL would be assumed to contain runtime libs and/or applications and must not depend on *-devel. I would rename CGAL-libs into CGAL and drop the current CGAL entirely. It doesn't make sense. Alternatively, if you want to keep *-libs, just drop CGAL entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review