Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488103 Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ivazqueznet@gmail | |.com) --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel.sylvan@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-02 21:20:20 EDT --- Almost ready -- everything is fine apart from the release number. MUST + rpmlint: clean + package name: ok + spec file name ? package guideline-compliant this should probably be 0.x.%{alphatag}%{?dist} + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate + license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible + source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs: noarch + build dependencies complete + own all directories + no dupes in %files + permission + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code + large docs => -doc: not that large + clean buildroot before install + filenames UTF-8 SHOULD - desc and summary contain translations if available + package build in mock on all architectures + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane + require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review