[Bug 487421] Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487421





--- Comment #4 from Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-03-02 10:58:50 EDT ---
The following items were listed as "musts" and all pass:

+ rpmlint ok
+ package name ok
+ spec name ok
+ guidelines ok
+ license: ok, matched
+ license in %doc, ok
+ specfile is English
+ specfile is legible

(TARBALL MUST MATCH UPSTREAM)

+ compiles/builds ok on my i686 install, satisfying the "at least one primary
arch rule"
+ no ExcludeArch required
+ no BuildRequires required, basic C library
+ no use of locales required, basic C library
+ calls ldconfig in %post and %postun as required
+ not relocatable
+ owns all directories since it creates zero of them
+ no duplicate files
+ defattr is correct
+ contains proper clean section
+ macro usage ok
+ package is code, not content, ok
+ no large docs, ok
+ docs do not affect runtime, ok
+ devel package created, ok
+ static package created, ok
+ pkgconfig N/A, ok
+ libraries ok
+ devel requires base as N-V-R, ok
+ no libtool archives, ok
+ no GUI apps, ok
+ no reownership, ok
+ cleans buildroot at install, ok
+ filenames are valid UTF-8, ok

All MUST items has passed, now reviewing SHOULD items.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]