Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-02 09:03:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Reviewing the Hg version (1.22.1-6) > > - homes.merjis.com is down at the moment, so I cannot pull expat and > fontconfig. Should be up again now. > - download link needs updating: it points to the 1.21 directory, not 1.22 > - F-10 has newer version (1.22.3); upstream has 1.22.4. Should not be a big > deal, > we can just get 1.22.1 reviewed and update later > > Any reason for the patch naming? (patch1000 !) The convention we've been using is that native patches use the same patch numbers as in the native package, and any mingw32-specific patches start counting at 1000. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review