Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Wojciech Pilorz <wpilorz@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wpilorz@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Wojciech Pilorz <wpilorz@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-02 06:02:54 EDT --- Is there any possibility that the mingw32 guidelines be changed and static libraries be included (perhaps in separated packages *-static*.rpm) rather than purged during build ? I want static libraries because I need to create a number of small tools running on NT4 or XP machines and distributes over company WAN to several hundreds of servers, and I definitely cannot make them depend of extra dlls. Perhaps I am not the only one who would need mingw32* static libs. Right now, to make standalone executable (not requiring any extra dlls) with mingw32-gcc on Fedora10 which needs, say, just MD5 functions from openssl, I need to recompile mingw32-openssl from source to get the static libraries. If such change is possible, it would make mingw32* more usable out-of-the-box for me (and I would be happy to volunteer to make patches for spec files of mingw32* if needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review