Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-01 09:49:55 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum `ls iscan-plugin-gt-*|sort` ed12335648c893eda194afee38e51351 iscan-plugin-gt-1500-2.1.0-2.c2.i386.rpm ed12335648c893eda194afee38e51351 iscan-plugin-gt-1500-2.1.0-2.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm f76725766f44debe3f3fec06d0e2023b iscan-plugin-gt-9400-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm f76725766f44debe3f3fec06d0e2023b iscan-plugin-gt-9400-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm 8b1c398ef58769d9ceb77ad771515de3 iscan-plugin-gt-f500-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm 8b1c398ef58769d9ceb77ad771515de3 iscan-plugin-gt-f500-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm b72a512a927b9f2020af817c5a541ae8 iscan-plugin-gt-f520-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm b72a512a927b9f2020af817c5a541ae8 iscan-plugin-gt-f520-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm 5f4137fd69198617b95bd59261affd75 iscan-plugin-gt-f600-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm 5f4137fd69198617b95bd59261affd75 iscan-plugin-gt-f600-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm bb623b47fd457e94f8d6b878b5d9ad99 iscan-plugin-gt-f670-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm bb623b47fd457e94f8d6b878b5d9ad99 iscan-plugin-gt-f670-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm cf191e84b03b28a8b0f629d60ba0b36e iscan-plugin-gt-f700-2.0.0-0.c2.i386.rpm cf191e84b03b28a8b0f629d60ba0b36e iscan-plugin-gt-f700-2.0.0-0.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm bda9d1dfe5c9524084b01e46a7a9f5e3 iscan-plugin-gt-s600-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm bda9d1dfe5c9524084b01e46a7a9f5e3 iscan-plugin-gt-s600-2.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm 02c151a49608ae911b1e200672ed236f iscan-plugin-gt-x750-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm 02c151a49608ae911b1e200672ed236f iscan-plugin-gt-x750-1.0.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm c33515ec3e57eed680cd599452141d45 iscan-plugin-gt-x770-2.1.0-1.c2.i386.rpm c33515ec3e57eed680cd599452141d45 iscan-plugin-gt-x770-2.1.0-1.c2.i386.rpm.from_srpm [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1210911 + No additional build dependencies. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files. + Permissions on files are set properly. + Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + No header files. + No static libraries. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + No libraries files with a suffix. + No .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review