Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-27 14:08:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - About the static library, shall I just make a package with just the static > library and no dynamic library, > or shall I add a -static subpackage and put the .a file in there? >From current guidelines, - create a package "rtaudio-devel" (from "rtaudio" srpm) (for this package, "rtaudio-devel" binary rpm only) * with containing static archives, header files and some documents * rtaudio-devel _must_ have "Provides: rtaudio-staic = %{version}-%{release}". And when other packages need "librtaudio.a" for building, such packages must have "BuildRequires: rtaudio-static", not "BuildRequires: rtaudio-devel" so that we can trace what packages are using static archives for linkage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review