Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-25 19:15:43 EDT --- I've updated the package with the latest version. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala-0.5.3-1.fc10.src.rpm As this package is language bindings for a language that generates C code for compiling I don't believe the rpmlint output is really valid. The files included are all for development not running of apps. $ rpmlint /home/perobinson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/gupnp-vala-0.5.3-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm gupnp-vala.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/gupnp-vala-1.0.pc gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review