Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> 2009-02-24 04:16:58 EDT --- Your explicit Requires are version-less. They are no better than the automatic SONAME deps. They are fragile even, since they would break if a library were moved to another package or if a package were renamed. The point of adding the comment here is to make the reviewer aware of this, too, as this ought to have caught during the review. > Doing so assumes that all the dependencies do proper SO versioning, > which may be a dangerous assumption. It doesn't take much to verify that the SONAMEs include major versions. Multiple libraries using the same SONAME would be a bad conflict in the package collection [unless it's a special-case of alternative installations that is being treated appropriately]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review