Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Truch <matt@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-23 15:37:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification you make. It is > easier to track. Sorry, forgot to do that. They're at: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-3.fc11.src.rpm > (In reply to comment #7) > > As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they > > claim that Debian requires it the way they do it. > Shared libraries should have a proper versioned soname. I really doubt Debian > forbids that. > http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html > > You can make one but problems will appear in case upstream decides on a > different scheme later on. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname > Starting with .0 for major is the best way. I still think you should insist on > proper soname upstream. I have told them upstream, and I think they will with the next release. For now I have .0 as you suggest. I think it's now kosher wrt sonames, please let me know otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review