Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-23 12:42:32 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Base.src: I: checking php-ezc-Base.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 27d5d39a21668eb3fbae60cc4aa8f0c2 Base-1.6.1.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-channel(components.ez.no) php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(PEAR) + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) = 1.6.1 php-ezc-Base = 1.6.1-2.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review