Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-23 05:24:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looks like the only concern is making sure legal is ok with the license. Is > that right, Alex? I've already talked to upstream (sort of; Sage upstream > anyways) about the license quite a bit but they don't choose to ship a license > I believe. (After all, it is a very small library.) Yep, that's the only (minor) issue. Somebody posted a link to more recent e-mail correspondence on #fedora-devel: http://lists.pardus.org.tr/paketler-commits/2008-January/042349.html that seemed to indicate GPLv2 (no "+"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review