Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-22 03:25:42 EDT --- > Please, excuse me for long delay. Not a problem, I'm also actually very busy > No, duedlines say what CVS, not released versions must start from 0. Definitely, I can't agree. Version 0.9 have been published on 2006-06-06 So this is a post-release version Read : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages I prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{peclName}.xml (or %{peclName}2.xml) (see recent approved changes in PHP Guidelines, this is to avoid possible conflicts between pecl, pear and other channel extensions). I need to search if %verify(not md5 mtime size) is acceptable in the Guidelines... Is the spec encoding ok ? It seems there is UTF-8 (ru sumnary) and ISO (pl sumnary) which make my text editor crazy ? $ file php-pecl-runkit.spec php-pecl-runkit.spec: Non-ISO extended-ASCII text, with LF, NEL line terminators -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review