Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: frozen-bubble - Frozen Bubble arcade gam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202439 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-16 02:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * The perl autoprovider in rpm adds some automatic provides since this package > > installs files into %{perl_vendorarch}. If these files are only going > > to be used by frozen-bubble, wouldn't it be better to put them somewhere > > in %{_datadir}/frozen-bubble instead? > > Erm, there are .so files installed to %{perl_vendorarch}, hence the package is > not noarch. Yes, my bad. The main point was that if these aren't perl modules that can be used by other applications then they should live in an application-specific directory instead of the system-wide perl tree. > I could try dropping them in %{_libdir}/frozen-bubble instead, but > I've got no clue howto make perl find them there (first perl package ever for me). > > Or we could just leave them there :) (in which case I could add a provides > filter to make it stop providing this if you want). I've seen python programs work with python libraries that don't live in %{python_sitearch} and figured that perl could work the same way. But if that's a problem, then a Provides: filter should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review