Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pastescript - A pluggable command-line frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198289 jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald@xxxxxxxxx 2006-08-15 23:37 EST ------- rpmlint: E: python-pastescript zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/PasteScript-0.9-py2.4.egg-info/not-zip-safe Ignore. W: python-pastescript doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pastescript-0.9/docs/example_cgi_app.ini /usr/bin/env W: python-pastescript doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pastescript-0.9/docs/example_wsgiutils_app.ini /usr/bin/env Many python scripts require this, ignore. About the name, upstream does use capitals when refering to Paste Script, however Debian also does python-pastescript, I'm inclined to follow along. * Uses both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Still readable but easily fixed on next commit. Good: + builds on devel x86_64 + uses setuptools + license (MIT) + noarch + sources match upstream + sitelib macro + follows python templates for macros and file listing script + proper %clean + macro usage throughout + file permissions and ownership Nearly ready for approval, but let's get resolution on the naming issue. See also python-pastedeploy, bug #198288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review