Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-20 06:41:38 EDT --- Let me comment about the rpmlint output (available at http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-4.fc10/rpmlint.txt): terminus-fonts.spec:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. terminus-fonts.src:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. The /lib/kbd/consolefonts directory belongs to the kbd package, and the kbd package itself hardcodes it as /lib/..., not /%{_lib} or %{_libdir} or anything with macros. Following rpmlint's suggestions would likely break things. terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/63-terminus.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/63-terminus.conf Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/terminus:unscaled /usr/share/fonts/terminus Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. All the other packages putting symlinks into the /etc/X11/fontpath.d directory also use absolute symlinks, so I am following a common practise here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review