Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> 2009-02-20 03:41:20 EDT --- Well, Tom only advised against including the EXCEPTIONS file because "it is of little value to anyone" (quote). That's not enough reason to exclude it. If we did include it, though, we would offer the same dual-/multi-licensing options as the upstream tarball (and our "License: GPLv3+" tag may not be explicit enough to signal our intent). And with that, somebody could choose to accept the dual-licensing and would be bound to term 1.b.ii, which I think is a problem, as for example, we don't do that for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review