[Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504





--- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-02-19 20:46:25 EDT ---
The package doesn't build in Rawhide:

Processing files: gget-epiphany-extension-0.0.4-7.fc11
error: 
File not found by glob:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-7.fc11.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget*

The epiphany extension does not get build because configure only checks for
epiphany <= 2.24, but rawhide already has 2.25. So you need to patch
configure/configure.ac, I will attach a patch.


Issues that needed to be fixed according to comment # 23:
OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license.
OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc.
OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a
%{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section.
OK - MUST: The packages do not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK - %changelog is complete now
OK - ChangeLog from source is included in %doc
OK - The desktop file contains a mimetype and update-mime-database is run
properly.
OK - Includes "Requires: dbus" now.
OK - Timestamp of Source0 is matching.

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gget-*
gget.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas
gget.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gget/metalink.py 0644
gget.i386: E: no-binary
gget.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 68, tab: line 6)
gget-epiphany-extension.i386: W: no-documentation
gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/epiphany/2.25/extensions/gget-epiphany.py 0644
gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings.

Two of these need fixing:
The non-executable-script error was my fault, please enable the chmod again.
The mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning is only cosmetic, but I suggest you
ether use spaces or tabs. Personally I prefer spaces, because tabs sometimes
look weird in (cvs) diffs.


Final Notes:

The BR could be reworked to be more precise and more legible:
BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel >= 2.10.0
BuildRequires: pygobject2-devel >= 2.12.0
BuildRequires: gnome-python2-devel >= 2.16.0
BuildRequires: gnome-python2-extras >= 2.14.2
BuildRequires: dbus-python-devel >= 0.82
BuildRequires: notify-python >= 0.1.1
BuildRequires: intltool
This is what configure really checks for. The versions are not really needed
for Fedora because all supported releases are up to date, but they might be
helpful for people who want to rebuild the package for EPEL or other older
releases.

Please add "--add-category=FileTransfer" to desktop-file-install to allow
nested menus (we are working on a set of submenu-packages for user who have a
lot of stuff installed)


The outstanding issues are only minor. Please do one more build to fix them and
to apply the patch and I will approve the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]