Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 Stefan Posdzich <cheekyboinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cheekyboinc@foresightlinux. | |org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Stefan Posdzich <cheekyboinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-18 16:11:07 EDT --- ++ REVIEW ++ MUST: rpmlint output | GOOD rpmlint fedora-ksplice-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint fedora-ksplice-0.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: package must be named according to Package Naming Guidelines | GOOD MUST: The spec file name must match the base package | GOOD MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines | GOOD MUST: licensed with a Fedora approved license | GOOD License: GPLv3 MUST: License field must match the actual license | GOOD MUST: Docs (with license) | GOOD AUTHORS COPYING README MUST: The spec file must be written in American English | GOOD MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible | GOOD MUST: md5sum | GOOD src.rpm: 8b6a7bbc5a1d14bd53b62fd405056fc2 fedora-ksplice-0.5.tar.gz upstream: 8b6a7bbc5a1d14bd53b62fd405056fc2 fedora-ksplice-0.5.tar.gz MUST: compile and build on at least one primary architecture. | GOOD http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1136624 MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires | GOOD MUST: not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing | GOOD MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly | GOOD MUST: Package is working | GOOD APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review