Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-18 12:32:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.5-0.2.rc1.fc11.src.rpm > > I have integrated the ppc patch into new SRPMS. Well, ppc64 also needs %{name}-0.4.5-rc1-revert-using-ipv4_order.patch. Actually assembly codes used in src/utils.h are ix86 specific and I guess 0.4.5 rc1 fails to rebuild on any non-ix86 architecture. I think applying the patch on all archs is preferable. (In reply to comment #25) > You said that srpm does not build on f10-updates-candidate due to bug in > GConf2-devel. That means iptux source codes do not cause the failure. Is that > right? Actually someone else filed this issue as bug 485667. For now adding "BuildRequires: dbus-devel" for F-10 (maybe also on F-9) like ---------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} < 11 # due to bug 485667 BuildRequires: dbus-devel ---------------------------------------------------- is preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review