[Bug 202448] Review Request: gnome-sharp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gnome-sharp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202448





------- Additional Comments From jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-15 10:35 EST -------
Alex, if the guidelines don't make sense, PLEASE PLEASE help us to make them
better.  Mono is one of those things that leave most of us scratching our heads
and trying to make sense of it.

The -devel package is to prevent development files being packaged in the main
package.  We've gone over this before, users may want to develop 32bit mono
software on a x86_64 host.  If mono isn't arch specific, then why aren't the
packages noarch?  I don't believe we "solved" anything last week, the headers
from the 32bit package and the 64bit package shouldn't conflict.  If they do,
the package needs to be fixed, not just avoided to sweep the problem under the rug.

if you wish to discuss the guidelines, please send mail to
fedora-packaging-list@xxxxxxxxxx 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]