Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-16 06:39:28 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent: [petro@host-12-116 Desktop]$ rpmlint django-authopenid-0.9.6-1.fc10.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro@host-12-116 Desktop]$ + I'm in doubts about package naming - Django packages in Fedora are named with first letter capitalized. However the upstream named it with all letters in lowercase, so I don't think this is a problem at all. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file with text of the license, is be included in %doc. + The spec file is be written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum django-authopenid-0.9.6.tar.gz* b15d22dd9d83a5c5fa8a0a640b40b3f4 django-authopenid-0.9.6.tar.gz b15d22dd9d83a5c5fa8a0a640b40b3f4 django-authopenid-0.9.6.tar.gz.from_srpm [petro@Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package MUST successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1129812 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, that the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. [26] APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review