Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-16 03:38:55 EDT --- I do not think that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database applies to this case, there is no MimeType key desktop entry. The author denied my request to add the license to all source files. I am quoting below our mails and his translated answer: "Deliberately I have not included a header with the license in each file. The license is specified in the file named COPYING and is relevant to the whole program with all its files. The program and all its files are licensed as GPLv2" Based on the content of the COPYING and the header of the main.c files, I think that it is safe to presume that the author makes no difference between GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and since both files indicate GPLv2+, this is the license to be used by us. Delivered-To: wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Received: by bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 404) id 4529F20847C; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (mx1.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.92]) by bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97852081FB for <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FGIDHU018478 for <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FGIDsK001041 for <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:13 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f10.google.com (mail-fx0-f10.google.com [209.85.220.10]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1FGHxAq020472 for <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:00 -0500 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so3277418fxm.17 for <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:17:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DLQZiH7Fh1evsUpENhH8aXdLCHG1tqLvZsK9fxGkgTE=; b=Nk1rVe4XYZ3daCwHijc/hVE0+P4ialpDxKFP0KaHUbfSHDUC2HQuIFD405JZ7arcKU kttOr3s0q0qc9iLXvVTVNcvo6Z+pQdKwA+FrpGoFmggN8NtBp67RTq0R1OatBXNeRcev g7iOJ/X2JNraHhh2bK9EJesVqywpsp+I/bIkk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=duG5Js4Xso5qHHOtetWIFwB27h/H81yxbksICyx6AShyaRBFuDavyHuPV0IswUlwsg 0fEu84CqE7AdezUW0BMA3gFxoOUfnX6mLksNQsVX+Lqpb50W52tmh6xOJ1+oW87jUL2g CSTXo+hMRsA3erbooEMLegUJkr+7bN1g8Ik/c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.241.15 with SMTP id t15mr2381592mur.85.1234714679154; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:17:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4997B5C9.7070400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> References: <4997B5C9.7070400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <8a5752f30902150817q187a872ajd01433b81e0b35bc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Net Activity Viewer - licenta From: Mihai Varzaru <mihaiv@xxxxxxxxx> To: manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b430c8d999200462f769fe X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.48.31 --001636b430c8d999200462f769fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nu am inclus in mod intentionat un header cu licenta in fiecare fisier. Licenta este specificata in fisierul COPYING si se aplica intregului program cu toate fisierele sale. Programul cu toate fisierele sale sunt licentiate cu GPL v2. 2009/2/15 manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Buna Mihai > > Scuze ca te deranjez, dar am o rugaminte. Programul tau este in curs de > a fi inclus in Fedora ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580), dar in cursul verificarilor premergatoare includerii am observat ca > fisierele sursa nu au inclusa licenta sub care este distribuit programul > decit in fisierul main.c. Din considerente legale (in SUA..) este preferabil > ca fiecare fisier sursa (.h / .c) sa includa un header in care sa fie > specificata licenta exacta sub care se afla, facilitind astfel si > posibilitatea ca fisiere din un program sa fie folosite in altul. > De aceea avem rugamintea sa incluzi si tu aceste informatii in toate > fisierele sursa. > Multumesc anticipat > > manuel > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review