Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-15 03:47:49 EDT --- I guess I don't have time to review this, however * Please make the build log more verbose so we can check if Fedora specific compiler flags are correctly honored. - Usually the output like ---------------------------------------------------------------- + ./waf build [ 1/20] cc: src/main.c -> _build_/default/src/main_1.o [ 2/20] cc: src/compat.c -> _build_/default/src/compat_1.o [ 3/20] cc: src/window.c -> _build_/default/src/window_1.o [ 4/20] cc: src/bookmark.c -> _build_/default/src/bookmark_1.o ---------------------------------------------------------------- is not useful. - And actually ps auwwx shows ---------------------------------------------------------------- 8626 pts/15 S+ 0:00 /bin/sh -e /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/INSTROOT/rpm-tmp.KdfCEV 8651 pts/15 Sl+ 0:00 python ./waf build 8696 pts/15 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/gcc -g -O0 -DDEBUG -Idefault -I.. -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 ../src/common.c -c -o default/src/common_1.o ---------------------------------------------------------------- so Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. - Would you explain why this package does not Provide sion despite that this Obsoletes sion? - --vendor="fedora" should not be used anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review