Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-14 06:38:13 EDT --- 1. If you have access to the fonts sources, please start by removing the pre-built *.ttf and *.otf and only ship the result of your build in the noarch package 2. Do not try to package both ttf and otf formats http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Choosing_the_right_font_format_to_package 3. The otf file in the archive looks suspiciously bigger thant the ttf file, and it has a newer timestamp. Please check with upstream it was actually build from the packaged sfds and not from a more recent version they forgot to publish 4. You need to add fontforge to buildrequires if you want you package to build in mock/koji. If you want to maintain packages in Fedora it's a good idea to install mock on your system http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock 5. you can drop %dir %{_fontdir} for fedora-devel (will probably change the behaviour of the macros in F9 and F10 too soonish) 6. your fontconfig file is not finished -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review