Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #17 from Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-13 10:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > I've checked with upstream and they told me I should consider it as GPLv2+. > [...] > > I can attach an IRC log snippet if necessary. > > Can you include that in the package? I checked with spot and he indicated that > this is OK as long as you're reasonably certain that the person you were > communicating with is the copyright holder. Obviously it will be academic once > a version is out, but until then we have to clarify the license. I've included it as "license-clarification.txt" in the package and it gets installed along with the other documentation. New files: Spec file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras.spec SRPM file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras-2.0.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review