Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SDL - SDL bindings for the Perl language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202437 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2006-08-15 02:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues/Questions: > > 1. There is a SDL_perl 2.1.3 on CPAN: > http://search.cpan.org/~dgoehrig/SDL_Perl-2.1.3/ > Is that version usable for the packages that use this version? > Or totally diffrent interface? I haven't tried myself but have been told by the previous maintainers from the repo that must not be named that that version is not usable, so I assumed it has a different interface. Also the frozen-bubble package which this bug block contains: "Requires: perl-SDL >= 0:1.19.0, perl-SDL < 0:2.0" and an identical BR. However I've just checked a few other distros / rpm-repo's and I've found that rpmforge have frozen-bubble working with perl-SDL 2.1.2 (with a small patch, so I guess the interface really is different). > If that package is imported someday > would it conflict with this one? > I honestly don't know, but since it seems that frozen-bubble can be made to work with 2.1.x quite easily I'll guess it would be better to make the jumpt to 2.1.x now. I'll post a new version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review