Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #2 from Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-10 23:06:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please do not hardcode a specific sourceforge mirror in the Source0 tag. the > recommended address is downloads.sourceforge.net. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Ahh thank you. I have corrected the SPEC file at the same URL. > According to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > any patch should be submitted upstream for evaluation/inclusion (+ a comment > with the URL of the bug report or whatever applies). I'd updated the SPEC fil to indicate that I've asked for upstream to include the patch in the next release for this. Next I'll try and decode sourceforge to file a real bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review