Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsexymm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193108 ------- Additional Comments From karlthered@xxxxxxxxx 2006-08-14 19:07 EST ------- Hello, thanks for reviewing my package. * Here's the updated spec : http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SPECS/libsexymm.spec * The srpm : http://darkenphoenix.free.fr/RPMS/RPMS/Extras/SRPMS/libsexymm-0.1.7-3.src.rpm * rpmlint output: [kurosaki@localhost i386]$ rpmlint -i libsexymm-0.1.7-3.i386.rpm [kurosaki@localhost i386]$ rpmlint -i libsexymm-devel-0.1.7-3.i386.rpm W: libsexymm-devel no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. * Issues: 1) About the license, I added a patch to correct the license file. Debian developers were told by libsexymm maintainers (David Trowbridge & Christian Hammond) that the license of the bindings is LGPL. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/libs/libsexymm/libsexymm_0.1.7-3/libsexymm-dev.copyright It has been fixed 2 weeks ago in libsexymm's svn but no release has been made since, if needed, I'll mail libsexymm maintainers. http://osiris.chipx86.com/svn/osiris-misc/trunk/libsexymm/ChangeLog 2) Right, it needs libxml2 to build. 3) Removed. 4) Corrected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review