Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-10 10:53:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ok, I'll add the LICENSE text and will add is as %doc. > ==> thanks. > 3) That is myself trying to share the same specfile with other distros, from > Red Hat, that still don't have eggs, like RHEL5 and 4 :-) If there is no > problem in leaving this, I'd prefer to have just one spec file. ==>That is valid reason then. you can keep if..endif > > Do you have any other suggestions before I tag 0.4.4 and push a new tarball > out? ===> yes. check rpmlint on binary rpm python-linux-procfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/python_linux_procfs-0.1-py2.5.egg-info you need to chmod 644 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/python_linux_procfs-0.1-py2.5.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review