Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-09 16:14:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Ah, my mistake. I was fixing the %configure flag, but the --docdir switch there > is actually ignored, and forgot about the actually-effective directive in > %install. No there still seems to be a problem there. rpm -qlp shows: [...] /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2 /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/AUTHORS /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/COPYING /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/COPYING-GPL /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/COPYING-LGPL /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/ChangeLog /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/INSTALL /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/NEWS /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/README [...] Can you bump the release number and post some new URLs just in case there is some caching problem at this end. > Fixed now. Per Toshio's email to packaging, is there any preference between > gedit-vtg and gedit-vala? For searchability, I'd say gedit-vala makes more > sense, but gedit-vtg will be closer to the upstream name. I really don't care either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review