Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-08 11:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Some comments: > > MUSTFIX: > * AutoReqProv: no > This disables rpm's automatic dependency tracking and therefore is strongly > frowned upon. > > * Epoch: 1 > Setting epoch to != 0 for a package to be included into Fedora is hardly > useful. > As I wrote above about Epoch and as a comment in the SPEC file about AutoReqProv, there are valid reasons for using both. > SHOULD: > * Building on x86_64 emits serious warning, e.g. this > > memory.h: In member function 'void* Pool::alloc(size_t)': > memory.h:55: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type > 'size_t' > memory.h: In member function 'void Pool::free(void*, size_t)': > memory.h:73: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type > 'size_t' > > In many cases, this kind of warnings are the origin of mal-functions. I use the software. I didn't encounter any problems (yet). But I'll see what we can do. Finally, I made a request to you at RPMFusion. I am re-iterating it: Please, pretty please, do not write in my bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review