Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-02-05 12:45:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Created an attachment (id=330847) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330847) [details] > strace ouput while using synfig > > There is few things that I feel as very annoying for > * First there is the synfig_module.cfg needs: > usually libtool-ltdl modules doesn't need to be hardcoded in such file. That > will be hard to extend the functionnalities of synfig if we need to register > every module using this. > * Then, it seems that the modules implementation settle on the needs of the > libtool .la files. This is very annoying and needs to be fixed. Nicolas, could you concentrate on reviewing the package, not the upstream product? Both of these are issues that are indeed worth looking into, but they only the second one seems to be related to packaging to some extent. I'd like to get this in first and then help upstream solving the issues with their product. See, there's little point in insisting the product is perfect when entering fedora and I doubt whether we'd have any packages at all if we did this for all packages ;) Thanks for pointing at the issues though, I'll try to follow up on them shortly, but please don't let it block you from doing a full review :o) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review