[Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381





--- Comment #2 from Aleksey Lim <alsroot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-02-05 10:59:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+,
> > so I use GPLv2+ in spec
> 
> What did the upstream say about this?

the right licence is GPLv3+,
now I'm waiting for authors' decision about merging branch(my packages based
on) to trunk, after that I'm going re-upload all TamTam packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]