[Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958





--- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-02-05 10:17:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)

Hi,

you are right, I'm maintaining kbd currently.

> rpmlint is not really happy at all:
> rpmlint of source RPM:
> kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools
> kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open
> kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools
> kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open
OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm
just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on
Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some
package), what do you think?

> kbd.src:23: E: prereq-use initscripts >= 5.86-1
Fixed (changed to plain Requires).

> kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz
> kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz
> kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz
> kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd
We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this.

> kbd.src: W: no-url-tag
There's no kbd homepage.

> 
> rpmlint of kbd:
> kbd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/kbd-1.15/ChangeLog
Fixed.

> kbd.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
See above.

> 
> 
> I think that --localedir=/usr/share/locale should be replaced with
> --localedir=%_datadir/locale
Fixed.

> 
> At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I
> suggest to also add doc/dvorak
I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already
are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]