Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-04 20:18:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330953) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330953) spec file patch - cleanups Please find attached a small patch for the spec which makes rpmlint happier. There are some errors left: rpmlint of dump: dump.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/dumpdates dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency bzip2-libs dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency e2fsprogs-libs dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsepol dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib I can understand the need of the zero-length dumpdates, but I do not understand why does the spec say: # This Requires is now mandatory because we only ship static binaries, and # need to ensure the "disk" group is created before installation (#60461) Requires: setup, e2fsprogs-libs, zlib, bzip2-libs, device-mapper Requires: rmt, libselinux, libsepol, glibc but later on you do: %configure --disable-static \ Of course rpmbuild picks all requires automatically, so I guess you should drop either the explicit requires or the --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review