Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-04 03:54:44 EDT --- OK, some additional steps (because of updated srpm): + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro@host-12-116 SOURCES]$ md5sum mpdscribble-0.16.tar.bz2* deeeb403ebd50b7abacd1eeabc96b320 mpdscribble-0.16.tar.bz2 deeeb403ebd50b7abacd1eeabc96b320 mpdscribble-0.16.tar.bz2.from_srpm [petro@host-12-116 SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all primary architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103246 This package is ============== ============== == APPROVED == ============== ============== Your next steps are: * Wait for someone, who sponsors you (I cannot sponsor you). * Request cvs branches (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure ) * Proceed from step 8 at this page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review