Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #69 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-03 16:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #68) > (In reply to comment #66) > likely anyways), the be renamed and a header that would include one depending > on __WORD_SIZE will be in their original place. This is a common practice. It would be an accurate solution, indeed. > When someone says "devel package", what comes to my mind is "useful for > development" Actually the package name is already ETL which only produce an ETL-devel. So I think we are good. I'm looking synfig/synfig studio to have usability tests of the ETL package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review