Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-02 06:04:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > > 1) Is anyone going to make a full review for this + sponsoring the packager? > > I unfortunately don't believe due to packaging policies that songbird can be > included until it can be compiled against the Fedora xulrunner rather than its > own. We are definitely not expecting songbird to use the "vanilla" libxul in order to be acceptable. (even thunderbird use it owns libxul, and it is very important for the songbird fedora package maintainer to look at how the thunderbird package is done. Specially about how to filter the provides of the internal libxul) BUT, using the system libxul should be doable at some later point. I will forward an email to remi who could do the final review and sponsorship (specially as he's experienced in mozilla apps packaging). Hence, I could assist him with a preliminary review. @David you seems to have done a release: 2, but the corresponding srpm isn't here. Can you implement the contribs dependencies source package to be smaller, as requested in #c20 ? I will start review then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review