[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Clone Of|481476                      |
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |roozbeh@xxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-29 16:37:48 EDT ---
Packaging is sane and upgrade path works

⬔⬔⬔ APPROVED ⬔⬔⬔

However:

— Please consider adding some explanation in the alt subpackage description on
the difference between alt and normal (it's in the package FAQ)

— Please consider adding fontconfig rules that make each font family substiture
for the other and for the gentium basic variants

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]