[Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376


Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-28 11:06:41 EDT ---
Sorry, been away. It all seems fine to me. Overall with the mingw* packages I
think there generally need to be updates to the packaging specs to cover the
mingw requirements (and rpmlint as appropriate) and also to include the license
file (to be fair we'd roast a commercial company for this!) and most of the
mingw reviews would be a breeze!

APPROVED!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]