Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-27 13:58:15 EDT --- Some notes for 0.52-3: - After discussion on fedora-devel-list, we reached consensus that duplicating Name in Summary is redundant. ------------------------------------------------------------ I've used the non standard group Development/Libraries/Java. But rpmlint doesn't show more errors. ------------------------------------------------------------ - rawhide rpmlint (rpmlint-0.85-3.fc11) still complains about this ($ rpmlint -I non-standard-group for details) - For Sourceforge hosted source code, please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net - # Doesn't run with gcj, so better build it with icedtea/openjdk too In such case, please use ------------------------------------------------------------ BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ Note that this (Build)Requires has Epoch (1:). On Fedora this is Provided only by java-1.6.0-openjdk(-devel) - Install java .jar file under %_javadir, not %_javadir/%name-%version. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Directory_structure ------------------------------------------------------------ install -d -m 755 %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -pR CHANGES COPYRIGHT README THANKS %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------------ - Using %doc is simpler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review