Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 --- Comment #6 from Tim Jackson <rpm@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-27 09:24:41 EDT --- Sorry, the SRPM was: http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns- 0.4.3-2.src.rpm Since no specific license version is explicitly specified by the author, it should actually be marked as "GPL+" as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses This is corrected in http://fedorapeople.org/~timj/packaging/bind-to-tinydns/bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-3.src.rpm and the corresponding spec. Manuel, those are warnings only in the compiler output; the package builds successfully on all architectures and whilst it would be better if they weren't there, as far as I can see there is nothing in the Packaging Guidelines stating that all compiler warnings must be patched out. Final point: I am intending to only import this on the EL-5 branch so if anyone wants to co-maintain in devel/F-10/F-9 then let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review