Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #7 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-27 04:29:27 EDT --- Guys, Thanks very much for the comments - I have a better appreciation of the automake issue now; I had just thought about it in terms of "what dependencies are needed to develop?" instead of the technical directory ownership issue. It does seem on the face of it that moving /usr/share/aclocal to filesystem would be a good idea, or at least some new automake-macros package which can then be required and not bring in the entire automake system. However, that's obviously something which needs agreement project-wide. So in that context, I suspect the best solution right now is Requires: automake. It solves the guideline issue, and it's consistent with other -devel packages. I can put a comment in the spec. about keeping a weather-eye out for changes to that, but I imagine there would be some mass bug-posting if that changed anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review