[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660





--- Comment #7 from Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-01-23 14:20:56 EDT ---
> I reviewed the upstream version because by definition so to say Fedora wants to
> have the latest version of the software, and the content in the cvs is very
> old. I assumed it will be easier for you to maintain a single or at least very
> similar spec for both places. 

Not really.  The upstream src.rpm (and its minimal .spec file) was added
as a convenience to those users who prefer that format to the tar.gz file.

> I apologize if I made an error by this assumption. Let me know what is
> the URL of the files that I should have reviewed and I will do it.

The "content in the cvs" (Fedora) is currently based upon the upstream
4.0-6.3 release from last April, and its .spec file updated when Tom Calloway
rebuilt it as 4.0-7 this past August.  Anyway, the .spec file in the devel
branch was -- as I recall -- carried over from a RHEL package version some
years ago.  Anyway, that's the only .spec file I've ever touched w/respect
to Fedora, and that's the one that I would have presumed would be the one
that would be "review-able".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]