Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2009-01-23 08:54:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Still not silent rpmlint: > > > python-cryptsetup.src: W: strange-permission python-cryptsetup.spec 0600 > > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. > > That's from your playing with git ;-) > > and on the binary package: > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python- cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.1 ['0.0.1-1.fc10', '0.0.1-1'] > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cryptsetup.so > > python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py /usr/bin/python > > Please, get rid of these (or at least most of them -- the last probably goes > away if the examples are not executable). No idea, about unscript binary > object. > unstripped-binary-or-object is usually result of missing the executable bits on that object -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review