Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225977 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2009-01-20 15:23:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanks for quick reply and addressing the problems! /me is much impressed > > 8.) Avoid absolute symlinks > > > > ln -sf /bin/ksh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/ksh > > could you please point me to some packaging guidelines or something about why > should I avoid them? ln -sf ../../bin/ksh seems to me pretty ugly to do it > without knowing the reason. thanks Apart from that I don't see what's ugly about "ln -sf ../../bin/ksh", you're probably right that the guidelines don't mandate this. At least I could not find anything. Only piece of information I was able to dig was a rpmlint warning, which is pretty non-specific: "Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments." I can't think of a real world-scenario where this would cause serious trouble. (Not considering "Imagine I have a complete tree somewhere and I do `something' to the linked file, such as write to it (there actually are tools that write to binaries, such as prelink or execstack)"). So, while I strongly urge you to get rid of that absolute symlink, it seems not to be mandatory. By the way -- how about removing it? What's ksh in /usr/bin good for? We're probably early enough in rawhide to have enough time to test if it breaks something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review